We were asked to create an abstract for our desired pathway next year for this weeks seminar task. I was able to read others, while unfortunately didn't turn out to be very helpful as they were not very clear, or were not aimed and my chosen pathway. However, other people were able to read mine and leave comments focusing on four specific questions:
1. Is the pathway clear?
2. Is the research process clear?
3. If it is, why? If not, why not?
4. How did they talk about practitioners?
This part I found useful to me, as I got some interesting feedback. It made me realise that my pathway choice written in my abstract wasn't all that clear. I realised that I had stated reasons against choosing the other too, and not entirely discussed many reason for specifying in the one that I have. Therefore this then made my research process not very clear. I definitely need to make this clearer and state my thinking and research process. Also, when talking about practitioners, I have only stated certain softwares, not anyone in-particular.
From this, I feel I want to re-write an abstract that I can post on my blog for new feedback. I know that I at least need to consider the four above questions to make this successful.
The last person to have read my abstract, then had to start creating a visual essay for it on PowerPoint. These are the images that someone had chosen for me:
These images are something I wouldn't of thought of creating and are different layouts to how I would normally work. I feel they have helped broadened my knowledge for the visual essay.
No comments:
Post a Comment